EEMI opinion: complaint against the web school which threatens its students
Here is the review originally posted on Google by a student who was enrolled for 3 years in this web school Parisian. On the Facebook page of the European School of Internet Professions (EEMI), he repeats his message, complaining that Google systematically censors its negative reviews.
Indeed, to be the school of Jacques Antoine Granjon (CEO of vente-privee.com), Xavier Niel (CEO of Free) and Marc Simoncini (CEO of Meetic), that necessarily gives you the connections to make your truth reign supreme on the internet, and censor all those who put themselves in the way of your school's reputation.
But does that give you all the rights? We have verified the evidence put forward by this student, and they are final: it is clear that the EEMI subjected this student to blackmail, pressure, and abusive final exclusion, with the sole aim of silencing this student. who complained of having been deceived by the school.
The initial point of contention? A Master BAC +5 in collaboration with the school Grenoble School of Management (GEM), proposed in Paris by the EEMI, for which this student had wanted to join the school. In the middle of his 3rd year, he learns that the Master will not take place. This student, as well as the other students concerned, ask the school for explanations. The school will remain silent on the subject, and even continued to promote this Master in Paris which no longer existed.
We have verified the evidence put forward by this student, and it turns out that this master's degree did not take place the year following his expulsion, where the school publicly wrote to the contrary. Here is his opinion on this subject published by Google, which has since mysteriously disappeared:
In this section:
The student's initial opinion on Google
Here is the review originally posted on Google:
Never register in this school, the EEMI, theEuropean school for internet professions. A management that does not hesitate to threaten and blackmail its students after having defrauded them. A complaint to the civil court has been filed. Let’s hope that justice does its job: I asked that the school be obliged to publish on the home page of its website the evidence of the blackmail they subjected me to, and the money I was subjected to. 'they stole from me.
The EEMI's response
The student's response
Edit to your answer of 12/12/2020: what defamation and what anonymity are you talking about?
My Google account is public, my photo too. You know very well who I am. If you do not remember any more, I add to this Google notice the receipt of my 1st complaint (I have since taken the civil court to request compensation).
I also add, for example, a photo of the management at two shows, with behind them a poster promoting the master's degree, which no longer existed at the time of these shows.
I have had phone calls authenticated in which a friend pretends to be a student interested in the school, and the manager specifies that the master is taking place in Paris. It is false advertising, no more and no less. And precisely, the fact of having played these recordings to students of the school is one of the reasons why the administration started to blackmail me.
It's a bit complicated to give all the evidence in a single opinion, but to all the students who would like to join this school, while waiting for justice to do its job and make this school “company” accountable publicly: contact- me on the email address nicolasdelagesugarde@gmail.com. I can even be reached by phone to tell you the truth about this school. I will give you FACTUAL EVIDENCE, for example email copies where you will see how the management does not hesitate to blackmail its students.
I am available in Paris, to show live, without special effects, my email box, the messages received, the recorded calls, as well as all the associated proofs (which were authenticated more than a year ago). I have a 4gb drive with sufficient evidence to prove that the school blackmailed me, threatened me, improperly excluded me, and used false advertising.
If the school wishes to respond to this article by commenting on it, we will then post the response after this article.
★☆☆☆☆
